OCCUPY THE COURTS Feb 15, 2012
Please view
Pages
-
Recent Posts
Blogs
Links We Like
OCCUPY THE COURTS
They tried to shut us down, they failed. Video later ( after I do too many other things )
Here is a video by George McDermott that will show you how far the Maryland Court of Appeals will go to cover for a criminal lawyer
OCCUPY THE COURTS ! WEDNESDAY IN BALTIMORE MARYLAND
Click thumbnail for larger image
Where it is: http://www.courts.state.md.us/directions/publicaccessmaps/baltimorecitycircuitcourt.pdf
When ruled against, you do have a choice to take action
First, review your own states laws : http://www.law.cornell.edu/states/listing.html
Review your states Constitution http://www.patrickcrusade.org/state_constitutions.htm
Due to an unsigned rubber stamped “order”, unsupported by rule or law, I am going to file against the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals of Maryland
Some of the law I will rely upon :
RULES FOR JUDICIAL-CONDUCT AND JUDICIAL-DISABILITY PROCEEDINGS
The “Toilet Tour”
http://www.occupythelaw.com/?p=212
Stand up like Shorty – step away from the computer and take some real action – like WE do!
Most of my Facebook friends have seen the posts made by my friend Duane G. Davis - a/k/a “Shorty”. Its important to note that behind Shortys quick wit and seemingly “humorous” comments lies the truth, the inequity, the absolute IN-justice of our “justice system”, and the fact that to be a dissident these days – requires the swat team, illegal and unprofessional acts by officers of the court, and the police, theft, and sanctionable actions by public defenders.
Otherwise, youre just another whiner sitting on your ass in front of your computer.
Shorty is a real person with all too real issues. Shorty has stepped up for YOU – now dont you think its time YOU did something too?
Thats Right, The Court Can Disparage YOU, Take Everything You own, and Call You names.. But Dont You DARE Even Allege That They Are Idiots!
From : http://www.courts.state.md.us/opinions/coa/2004/10a03ag.pdf
copy paste ;
(quoting In the M atter of Gre enfield, 24 A.D.2d 651, 652, 262 N.Y.S.2d 349, 351
(N.Y.App.Div. 19 65). Furthe r, the court ob served:
“Judicial officers … are not immune from suit or criticism; but, like every one
else, they are protected against scandalous charges. To make a public, false
and malicious attack on a judicial officer is more than an offen se against him
individually; it is an offen se against the dignity and integrity of the courts and
of our judicial system. It may bring discredit upon the administration of justice
amongst citizens who have no way of determining the truth of the charges. It
tends to impair the respect and authority of the court.”
Id. at 707 (qu oting Greenfield, 24 A.D.2d at 652, 262 N.Y.S.2d at 350-51, in turn quoting
Matter of Bevans, 225 A.D. 427, 431, 233 N.Y.S. 439, 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929) (citations
omitted)). See also In re Grimes, 364 F.2d 654, 656 (10th Cir. 196 6), cert. denied, 385 U.S.
1035, 87 S. Ct. 775, 17 L. Ed. 2 d 682 (1967). In re Daniel Friedland, 416 N.E.2d 433 (Ind.
1981).
In order to prove your allegations, they would have to comply with Discovery requests
Yeah – good luck with that!
Why Everyone Should Become a Dissident
In the lower court, regarding the legal malpractice lawsuit I filed against J. Edward Martin “Esquire” ( with multiple Charter sufixes ) the trial court ignored the absolute fact that Martin filed a dispositive motin eight months past the date allowed, and that he filed regarding the same medical expert that he used when he represented me in the underlying case ..get this… using the exact same argument the underlying cases attorney used.
He used undisclosed documents to do this, refusing to respond to discovery requests, and refusing to answer interrogatories. And, the court allowed this.
My Appeal to the Court of Special Deals in Maryland regarded these questions:
ISSUES PRESENTED
1 – Did the trial Court err by granting Summary Judgment to the Appellee when the Appellees motions are untimely, are in bad faith and are unethical, there was no expert independent medical exam, no foundation provided to Appellees expert, there is no expert affidavit or opinion, and Appellees medical expert has no professed expertise in this medical circumstance, and therefore, no testimony to support the Appellees’ pleading?
2 – Did the trial court err by not considering relevant, highly important and admitted evidence regarding the Appellants medical expert who in the underlying two cases was named twice as Appellants medical expert by the Appellee, and who in the underlying same two cases was designated by the Appellee who testified to the Record that this same medical expert would testify to causation, damages, future medical expenses and lost wages, but who now is subjected to an untimely and disingenuous Frye-Reed analysis that the Appellee has been aware of since his representation of the Appellant from 1999 to 2003?
3- Did the trial court err by considering the Appellees Second Motion for Summary Judgment under Md. Rule 2-501, when the Appellee with fraud, malice and forethought, concealment of documents and purposeful deception, took one position in the underlying case, and then a completely contrary position in this case that is absolutely intended to carry out his threats of harm to the Appellant by not timely objecting to Appellants medical expert testimony or discovery, and then waited eight months past the scheduling order for filing dispositive motions until he was sure the Appellant had spent thousands of dollars on her experts to file these deceitful motions to mislead the court and the Appellant, as he knows the only way he can prevail, is by trickery and deceit ?
The Court blew me off with a seriously flawed and incorrect “memorandum” of law that couldnt even quote to my appeal brief correctly, and seemed to be written by a senile person – or perhaps one suffering from what is known to be “the black robe of payoffs” syndrome expedited by corporate donations and glad handing of back door ( if you get my drift ) deals and old boy networking whores.
So, I filed a writ of certiorari – which was completely blown off without opinion OR A SIGNATURE by Judge Robert Bell.
I then filed a Motion for reconsideration that included as seperate motions, a writ of mandamus, and a motion for summary judgment.
Oddly, I received today an “order” that only states the motion for reconsideration is denied.
OK.. they want a war, they just got one. I tried to go by the law, but its obvious that the courts will cover even the most heinous depraved predator there is in Towson, Maryland. Thats not opinion, he attacked me physically and sexually, and I know from his secretary that this is nothing unique to me.
The door is opened now Martin. C’mon down you pizza faced jerk.
Judge Robert Bell of the Court of Appeals of Marylands unsigned rubber stamped “orders”. Amazing the extent these people go to , to cover one of their own.
Its sad, its very very sad that THIS is what our “legal system” has become.
Waiting for the Inevitable BITCH SLAP from the Maryland Court of Appeals
I mean, the Maryland Court of Special Deals – for protected criminal lawyers of course.
Did some digging for my excursion into the depths of the black robed conspiracy, and will be asking for a copy of the determining judges oaths of office, and Ill be forced to sue them if they blow off the Motion for Reconsideration, that includes a writ of mandamus, and a Motion for Summary Judgment.
After all, the criminal lawyer admitted to the record in front of a trial court judge that he is negligent. After all, his insurance lawyers are doing to me what the previous defendant did to him. Only the criminal lawyer and his legal counsel decided to sit on this undisclosed information for years – waiting until I spent thousands and thousands of dollars on experts, and other expenses ( I had to get a lawyer for a little while while recovering from Lymes – $$$ – but he did turn out to be a good guy so I was glad I met him ) and they waited to file this malicious motion at the last minute, an eight month past due date for dispositive motions no less -
AND THE JUDGE ALLOWED IT !!!
This is how bad it is when you sue a lawyer.
So, been looking around and found out some interesting stuff
From ; http://freedom-school.com/acceptance/
INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE OF THE NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF CONSTITUTIONS AND OF OATH OF OFFICE
Any elected or appointed official or Attorney refusing to honor an acceptance of their Oath is simply impersonating a public official and their alleged [Texas] Penal Code 37.11 Impersonating a Public Servant – 3rd degree felony. One can also see, 18 USC Sec. 912, 01/03/95; EXPCITE: TITLE 18 – CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART I – CRIMES, CHAPTER 43 – FALSE PERSONATION; HEAD: Sec. 912. Officer or employee of the United States. STATUTE: Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
In regards to protecting oneself from “abusive” public servants: check out the [your] State laws on “stalking” and “exploitation” as well as “neglect to protect” provisions in State law [upholding and enforcing the law by parties under Oath of Office] as well as Title 18 USC §1621 concerning the “neglect to protect” by persons under Oath, and Title 42 USC § 1986, wherein a person having “knowledge of the law”, “the power to stop a wrong” and the “duty to prevent a wrong from being done” is liable for any failure to act. Should they fail to prevent a wrong, having knowledge of the law, the power to prevent, and the legal or moral duty to prevent the wrong, which causes deprivations of your religious and/or civil rights or Liberties, suit can be brought for violations.
“Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the Constitution of the United States as our Fathers made it inviolate. The people of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” –Abraham Lincoln
“Bind down the Public officials with the chains of the Constitution” —Thomas Jefferson
and from : http://caught.net/prose/badjudge.htm
A Judge is not immune for tortious acts committed in a purely Administrative, non-judicial capacity. Forrester v. White, 484 U.S. at 227-229, 108 S.Ct. at 544-545; Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. at 380, 98 S.Ct. at 1106. Mireles v. Waco, 112 S.Ct. 286 at 288 (1991).
A Judge as a State Actor is not vested with the sovereign immunity granted to the State itself . See: Rolfe v. State of Arizona, 578 F.Supp. 987 (D.C. Ariz. 1983); Rutledge v. Arizona Bd. of Regents, 660 F.2d 1345, (9th Cir, 1981) cert. granted Kush v. Rutledge, 458 U.S. 1120, 102 S.Ct. 3508,73 L.Ed.2d 1382, affirmed 460 U.S. 719, 103 S.Ct. 1483, 75 L.Ed.2d. 413, appeal after remand 859 F.2d 732, Ziegler v. Kirschner, 781 P.2d 54, 162 Ariz. 77 (Ariz. App., 1989).
I have this feeling that Ill need this. And this is just ONE lawyer – see below for the federal case – thats 8 lawyers and four law firms
Federal Appellate Court Brief
I dont let these slimeballs slide – I call them all on treating me differently than “lawyers”.
Theres some good citations – for those of you who feel youve been discriminated against because you are pro se – check it out.
Federal Pro Se Appellate Brief
Arent you tired of corporate lawyers getting away with ( almost ) murder? It amazes me that even with a signed affidavit stating that they are illegal – the courts still cover for them.
The courts wouldnt do the job theyre supposed to do … so I sued them.
Been Waiting
Got a huge amount of work already in the Maryland Court of Appeals - Click to see -
Making the screenplay for the promotional video this week.
Having Cancer surgery – not feelin too creative.